Thursday, January 22, 2015

Crimes of the South African Police Service

http://www.citypress.co.za/entertainment/10-best-sa-street-posters/#lightbox/6/

Crimes of the South African Police Service

Zille weighs in on Hawks boss controversy

2843517INLSAHelen Zille
Available information seems to suggest that Hawks head Anwa Dramat was suspended because he investigated high-level corruption, according to DA leader Helen Zille.
“Dramat's mistake was that his forensic investigations came too close to Zuma Inc the president Jacob Zuma , his family and their network of patronage,” Zille claimed in her weekly newsletter.
She reached this conclusion using the “duck test”: “If something looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it is probably a duck,” she said.
“Of course, the 'duck' in this case refers to a purge of anyone who gets too close to investigating corruption in Zuma’s network.”
She conceded, however, that “this is a very complex case”.
Zille said Zuma closed the Hawks' predecessors, the Scorpions, while he was awaiting charges of fraud and corruption, which were subsequently withdrawn; Dramat was suspended in December even though the Constitutional Court ruled in November that a clause giving the police minister the power to do this was unconstitutional.
The DA knew, on the grounds of a meeting between Dramat's lawyers and Robert McBride, head of the Independent Police Investigating Directorate, that Dramat was cleared of alleged involvement in renditions to Zimbabwe.
“After the Constitutional Court ruling in November, Dramat asked for the Nkandla file to be handed over to the Hawks for investigation.
“SA Police Service did not comply, and shortly after this Dramat was suspended by Police Minister Nkosinathi Nhleko.”
Zille questioned the timing of Dramat's suspension, given that her party understood the Ipid probe clearing him was concluded nine months previously.
“It most certainly quacks like a duck,” she wrote.
His replacement Maj-Gen Benny Ntlemeze's target appeared to be Lt-Gen Johan Booysen, head of the Hawks in KwaZulu-Natal, because he started investigating influential people linked to Zuma, she said.
The High Court in Pretoria heard an application by the Helen Suzman Foundation for Nhleko's decision to suspend Dramat to be set aside. Judgment was reserved.
Nhleko's spokesman Musa Zondi told reporters that the minister was prepared to meet Dramat to iron out issues.
“There is no witch-hunt. Once you take that out, anything is possible. The minister has an open mind,” he said.
Sapa
http://www.iol.co.za/capetimes/zille-weighs-in-on-hawks-boss-controversy-1.1806871#.VMFCgkeUdDQ












Crimes of the South African Police Service

POLICE MINISTRY WITHDRAWS NATIONAL KEY POINTS APPEAL

The R2K campaign challenged the police minister to make public the names of 200 key points.

Crimes of the South African Police Service

http://www.news24.com/

Crimes of the South African Police Service

Cop caught on film looting in Soweto

2015-01-22 14:43
(SAPS)
(SAPS)

Johannesburg - A police officer filmed participating in looting in Dobsonville, Soweto, will be formally charged, Gauteng's community safety MEC said on Thursday.
"We have already acted against the individual that's identified in the clip... He's definitely going to be formally charged," Sizakele Nkosi-Malobane told reporters in Johannesburg.
She said the officer had been stationed in Dobsonville.
Two people have been shot dead and two injured since violence broke out between locals and foreigners this week.
The looting of foreign-owned shops started on Monday after 14-year-old Mthetheleli Siphiwe Mahori was shot dead, allegedly by a foreign shop owner in Snake Park.
The boy was allegedly with a group that tried to rob the shop.
"We suspect that it is a revenge attack, they're responding to the boy that was killed," Nkosi-Malobane said.
Eighty-one foreign shops had been looted since Monday and 68 people arrested.
- SAPA

Crimes of the South African Police Service

Cops force journo to delete photos

2015-01-22 17:44
(Shutterstock)
(Shutterstock)


Johannesburg - A Sapa reporter was forced by three police officers, not in uniform, to delete pictures from her cellphone she took outside a Somali-owned shop in Dobsonville, Soweto, on Thursday.
"The one officer stood over my shoulder as I deleted them one by one," Mpho Raborife said.
"Then he told me that I am not allowed to take a photo of that scene because it was a public violence matter so that area was part of their jurisdiction."
Raborife was driving to work when she passed three Somali-owned shops.
Three marked police vehicles were parked outside. Two men were loading items, including packs of cold drinks, into a white van.
The journalist pulled over, put on her hazard lights and ran to the area to take several photos. After she got back into her car and drove for about 700m, a police vehicle tried to flag her down.
"Then they drove next to me and one rolled down the window and told me to pull over. Then I pulled over and they asked me where the photos are that I took as I was not allowed to take pictures of a police scene," Raborife said.
"I told them I was a journalist and they said that they had no proof of it and then I showed them my press card.
"Then they said either way I am not allowed to take pictures because I did not ask permission, and that I can't just show up at a scene and take photos and leave."
Another officer told Raborife they wanted to see the photos. He held on to her press card and took her cellphone. Then said they had to take her to their station commander.
She told them she was running late for work, and asked if she could use her phone to inform her bosses. They said no.
Raborife offered to delete the photographs and to call her boss, but the officers insisted she accompany them to the Dobsonville police station.
‘Grossly unprofessional’
On the way there the officers stopped and told her that going to the police station would take a long time, but if she deleted the pictures they would let her go.
"I told them that it was an open place, a neutral zone and a public area and the cop insisted that I was not allowed to take pictures there and 'leak them to the public'."
They gave her back her phone and press card after she deleted the photographs.
An officer took down Raborife's details while another officer took a photo of her car.
Sapa editor Mark van der Velden said the reporter identified herself with a press card and while the police were in a police van, they were in plain clothes and did not identify themselves as required.
"On the facts available so far, this amounts to grossly unprofessional and unprocedural behaviour by police officers who clearly knowingly went out of their way to intimidate a working journalist to suppress public interest information on a very topical news story on xenophobia.
"Well-known standing orders for any police dealing with media specifically prohibits forcing them to delete photos, and they know this very well," he said.
Van der Velden said this was another incident of police officers ignoring firm standing orders from their own commanders because they get away with it.
Sapa will, also through the SA National Editors' Forum, lodge a formal complaint with the police commissioner's office and follow up with enquiries as to what action was taken, he said.
"What happened is unfortunate," Gauteng police spokesperson Kay Makhubela said.
"Let her open a case so we can investigate. I don't think it's necessary to delete the photographs because the reporter was doing her job," he said.
"A journalist must ask permission when they arrive at a crime scene. For now she must open a case because an allegation is an allegation. If she opens a case, it is based on the case not a rumour."
Raborife would open a case later on Thursday.
Police commissioner Riah Phiyega's spokesperson Solomon Makgale was not immediately available for comment.

- SAPA

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Crimes of the South African Police Service


The International Criminal Court

Website and contact information:
http://www.icc-cpi.int/
Postal address:
Po Box 19519
2500 CM, The Hague
The Netherlands

Visiting the International Criminal Court                                   
Main entrance                                    Visits - Hearings
Maanweg, 174                                    Regulusweg
2516 AB, The Hague                          2516 AB, The Hague
The Netherlands                                  The Netherlands
Tel.  + 31 (0)70 515 8515                   Email  visits@icc-cpi.int

Fax  +31 (0)70 515 8555                     Fax  +31 (0)70 515 8499   

Crimes of the South African Police Service

Another top Jozi cop linked to sleaze king
By KatlegoMoeng | Jul 29, 2010 |

MORE revelations of police shady dealings with Hillbrow's underworld have surfaced.
In the latest, it has come to light that Hillbrow's acting station commissioner Koos van Rhyn has a cosy relationship with alleged Mafia boss Alan Kukard.

Deputy Minister of Police FikileMbalula has ordered authorities in Gauteng to investigate the claims. His spokesperson PaenaGalane confirmed that numerous allegations have been brought to the ministry's attention relating to Van Rhyn and Kukard.

Sowetan has correspondence between Mbalula's chief of staff Tsholofelo Lejaka and retiring provincial commissioner Perumal Naidoo's on the investigation.

The papers say Gauteng deputy commissioner, Major General Simon Mpembe, and provincial head of detectives, Major General Norman Taioe, were mandated "to personally attend to the complaint(s)".

Galane confirmed the correspondence but refused to comment on a possible conflict of interest in light of Naidoo's link to Kukard.
On Tuesday, Sowetan published an article and pictures of Naidoo being rewarded by the so-called Hillbrow community, headed by Kukard.
Mbalula said that he was "disturbed" by the report.

The matter had also been referred to national police commissioner General BhekiCele's office.
Tebogo Merafhe, president of the National Rental Association of South Africa, claims the Hillbrow Mafia's members include Van Rhyn.

Senior officers at Hillbrow and sources close to both men claim Van Rhyn frequents Maxime brothel, owned by Kukard, where he spends at least two hours when he's on duty.
"Van Rhyn is looking after the area's business community. Kukard is one of his main men," said an officer.

Merafhe alleges: "Kukard uses his influence on police to bulldoze his competitors in the city. The Hillbrow police are reluctant to investigate at least four deaths in the last two years at Maxime brothel."

Maxime is notorious for child prostitution and drugs. Kukard also owns two other brothels.
The deaths are allegedly linked to NDA security, owned by Kukard. NDA is the mother body of Corporate Assets Management Security, which provides its services to numerous buildings in Hillbrow and Berea.

Merafhe alleges Kukard's right-hand man Marvin Resant threatened him for interfering with matters related to Kukard's properties.

"He pointed at me with a gun and said he can close the case at Hillbrow police easily," Merafhe said.
Naidoo says the Hillbrow Business Forum threw him a farewell party hosted by Kukard at his house. Hillbrow Community Policing Forum chairperson Moses kaMoyo said the business body is not recognised.

Kukard has not replied to calls norSMSes. Hillbrow police help desk said Van Rhyn was not available.

Provincial spokesperson Brigadier GovindsamyMariemutoo said: "The matter is under investigation."










Crimes of the South African Police Service


So much doesn’t add up regards Sergeant Maurice Grootboom’s version of what happened with the missing laptop:
1.       Grootboom agreed that Burmeister had asked to ‘book out’ the laptop as he was going to take it to the IT company which implied a purpose and not a seasoned cop making the dumbest theft attempt. Grootboom admitted that that was not the behaviour of someone wanting to steal.
2.      He doesn’t remember who else was on shift but remembers that Sergeant Carmen Coetzee wasn’t (Coetzee’s role seems to be becoming integral to the Defence’s case).
3.      He would switch from remembering nothing to remembering things that lack solidity. This led to Bruwer accusing him of making up a story… and being told to do so.
4.      When there’s a shift change, there’s a handover which includes a check on all items in the safe and a signing for such. The computer wasn’t reported missing. Furthermore, the OB (Occurrence Book) made no mention of the alleged incident.
5.       Why did Grootboom do no follow-up for months on the laptop that had gone missing in his watch?
6.      Grootboom stated in court that he’s worked the day shift which was contradicted by his affidavit in which he had stated the night shift that started at 6pm and ended at 6am. This suggests that his affidavit was wrong and begs reason why?
7.       Grootboom says that in February he was called in by Colonel Jeffrey Matiwane, the acting Station Commander, and told that a case was being made against Burmeister. He was told to make an affidavit which he did whilst sitting at the Colonel’s desk. He claims that the Matiwane left the office whilst he did so and that he, Grootboom, left the affidavit there. A typed version of his affidavit then appears, strangely witnessed by Sergeant Koba who hadn’t been present. Additionally, Grootboom admitted that he’d altered his original statement and that he had never signed the newer, typed version.
8.      Grootboom’s statement also includes details such as MrsDippenaar looking for the laptop at the station which is odd as that happened, for the first time, two months after Grootboom had been on shift during which Burmeister had ‘taken’ the laptop i.e. detail was added that suggests it was gained from others.
In between Grootboom’s testimony, there was a recess during which one observer ironically said to Burmeister, “He was a good witness for you.”
During Grootboom’s testimony, a late arrival into the public gallery was noticed by several people to be illegally recording the proceedings. The man was later seen to be seemingly coaching Sergeant Coetzee who was sitting on the bench outside Courtroom D in which we were in. This mysterious man was identified as Derek Daniels from the SAPS Intelligence Unit. Immediately after a lunch recess, Bruwer made an emphatic note to Magistrate Derek Torlage that this was improper behaviour.
This wasn’t the first strangeness displayed by the police. As reported previously, Burmeister was oddly arrested, held for several days in a cell at another police station (run by his ex-station commander, Colonel Michael Nolans), was not allowed to have his wife see him, and had his house searched without a warrant. Why would a small case of alleged theft attract so much attention and bizarre actions when other police, accused of serious crimes, are treated with seeming respect and delayed court action?
Daniel’s presence further bolsters local rumour that a conspiracy of police officers aimed to remove Burmeister from the police force. Possible reasons why will be discussed at a later stage.




Crimes of the South African Police Service

Witnesses: Drunk cop crashes into shack
2014-07-21 11:38

(File, Nielen de Klerk, News24) (Nielen de Klerk)
Galeshewe - A Northern Cape police officer is being investigated for reckless and negligent driving after allegedly driving his police van into a shack an almost killing a bedridden man at the weekend.

The officer was on duty and, according to witnesses, drunk after visiting a shebeen, reported the

He crashed a police van into the shack of Joseph Mothwaring, who is recovering from an operation.

According to witnesses, the officer had three civilian passengers with him and told them to leave the scene as he would sort it out.

The witnesses insist that the officer was visibly drunk and that he was quickly taken off the scene without being breathalysed.

Police claim that the officer swerved the vehicle to avoid hitting a person who was in the road.
- News24
Top of Form





Crimes of the South African Police Service

Prosecutor Thibedi called Captain Michelle Lesch as his second witness.
Lesch was a notable, professional improvement on Grootboom. Befitting her position as a high ranking officer, she provided clear answers and would often add info for clarification.
She provided insight into regulations and how the police station treated evidence. Regards the latter, which is vital to this case, she said that evidence would be collected each morning from te safe at CSC (Community Services Centre) by a SAP13 clerk (either Sergeant Carmen Coetzee or Sergeant Abraham Coetzer). This would then be noted in a ‘register’ which in turn would be checked on by a higher ranking officer who’d make a ‘list’.
As final oversight, a monthly ‘certificate’ would be sent to provincial headquarters.
From her testimony, the following facts and history of actions were obtained:
1.       The laptop was part of the same evidence that included 41kg of dagga. The laptop was in the same bag. When the dagga was destroyed, the laptop was not with it and was classified as “outstanding”. “Outstanding” does not mean “missing”, just that it has not been disposed of and should still be sitting on a shelf in the SAP13 store room at the back of the Knysna SAPS station.
2.      The records show that Sergeant Maurice Grootboom (CSC) signed the laptop over to Sergeant Coetzee, the SAP13 clerk, who noted it in her register.
3.      Coetzee and Coetzer update their register monthly. During part of this period in 2013, Coetzer was on leave.
4.      An error in the check-up by superiors is that they compile lists based on the register i.e. if the register is incorrect, then the list would be incorrect (and, in turn, so would the monthly certificates). Nevertheless, Captain DewaldKitching checked on November 28 and Captain Patrick Gogwana on December 30 2013. Neither reported the laptop missing.
5.       Captain Kitching had been involved in the bust that had netted the laptop and the R150 000 worth of dagga.
6.      On January 31 2014, Captain Lesch, when compiling a list, found the laptop to be missing and became aware that a case docket had been opened against Johann Burmeister.
7.       At no stage did Coetzee or Coetzer report the laptop missing to their superiors.
8.      Earlier, Bruwer, the attorney for Johann Burmeister, the defendant, stated that, according to the chain of evidence, that if anyone was to be blamed for the missing laptop, it should be Coetzee – Grootboom had agreed.
It was an eventful first day of court that showed flaws in the Knysna SAPS auditing. It also raised disturbing questions around the authenticity of Maurice Grootboom’s affidavit that was used against Burmeister. Senior Prosecutor Thibedi was obviously no match for Advocate Bruwer. It could also be said that lies were no match for the truth.
Magistrate Derek Torlage was again to be commended. He was often a voice of reason and clarification. His granting of recesses allowed the fetching of evidence from the police station next door which undoubtedly saved lengthy delays. True to his word at Burmeister’s previous court appearance, he was ensuring a speedy trial.
Denise, Johann Burmeister’s wife, emphasised some of this by saying that she “witnessed the lies come to light” and “was stunned beyond belief” but that “the cross-examination delivered by Adv. Bruwer was out of this world. I am glad that this case has finally started so that we can start rebuilding our lives!“
Trial day #2 in Courtroom D, upstairs at the Knysna Magistrate’s Courts, at 9am tomorrow (July 23 2014).




Crimes of the South African Police Service

The Police versus Johann Burmeister
23 July 2014, 10:55

Johann Burmeister, as defendant, couldn’t have wished for a better prosecution… why… because the prosecution was that hopeless. The 14 people who turned up to support ‘Burmie’ left without a doubt that he was being set-up and lynched… and that, thankfully, the prosecution’s rope was thinner than string.
Burmeister was a long-serving, well respected, Knysna cop until he was kicked off the police force earlier this year and suspiciously charged with stealing a laptop from evidence. Their possible motive is the biggest question, one which has disturbed many citizens. In ‘Is Johann Burmeister a Good Cop Being Destroyed?’,i gave you the background to the situation and explained why i have chosen to support him.
Despite this being his fourth court appearance, this was only the first day of his trial. While he’s waited anxiously to clear his name the past 8 months, he’s struggled to keep his house and family safe, relying on goodwill from his supporters (over 400 on his ‘Stand by Burmie’ Facebook group) to get them through. It was undoubtedly with a juxtaposition of nerves and relief that he sat in the dock.
The Knysna SAPS seemed to lose their case with their first witness, Sergeant Maurice Grootboom, who had made an affidavit implicating Burmeister. Grootboom was distinctly uncomfortable under an onslaught of questions from the highly capable, defence advocate, Eduard Bruwer. For hours, he forced Grootboom to stop evading only to poke holes in the eventual answers.
Maurice Grootboom claimed to be in charge of the CSE (Community Service Centre a.k.a. the charge office found as you enter a South African police station) when he allowed Burmeister to take the laptop from evidence without signing it out. He claimed that he’d been busy so had, on trust, allowed this to happen. He then forgot to check it was back in but had realised it wasn’t when Warrant Officer Appels, in the next shift, had called to query him. Thereafter, he forgot about it… until 3 months later, in February 2014, when he signed the affidavit that had eventually led to him being the State’s witness.
Burmeister has claimed that he took the laptop, which he had recovered from thieves, to a local computer shop who identified whose computer it was. With that info, he then contacted RadieDippenaar, the supposed owner, who stated that it was in fact his son’s (Jandre). Burmeister then returned it to Sergeant Carmen Coetzee at the Knysna Police Station.
Read Part 2, which covers what happened in court, contradictions by Grootboom and the mysterious appearance by a member of SAPS Intelligence.