Saturday, June 13, 2015

Crimes of the South African Police Service

JMPD cancels 6 million traffic fines

April 30 2015 at 07:25am 

By Gabi Falanga

Dumisani Dube



Justice Project SA chairman Howard Dembovsky talks to the media about complaints of incorrectly issued infringement notices. Picture: Dumisani Dube

Johannesburg - More than six million traffic fines issued to Gauteng motorists between April 2009 and December 2012 have been cancelled by the Johannesburg metro police department.
JMPD director Gerrie Gerneke told reporters on Wednesday that fines issued during this period would no longer affect licensing processes.
Drivers would not be pulled over at roadblocks in connection with them, he said.
“The cases have been taken off the system and marked as ‘finalised’ with a special code.”
In March the Johannesburg metro police department announced it had complied with the public protector’s proposed remedial action for issuing infringement notices via ordinary mail instead of registered mail.
On 18 December, public protector Thuli Madonsela said in a report that the Johannesburg metro police department had acted improperly and that the fines did not comply with the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act.
“The acts of the JMPD accordingly constitute improper conduct and maladministration,” she said.
Last month Gerneke said motorists could apply to have those fines cancelled by filling in an Aarto form.

'HUGE ADMINSTRATIVE BURDEN'
However, the Justice Project of South Africa complained that it would be a “huge administrative burden” for the public to do this - and all fines from that period were cancelled.
Justice Project chairman Howard Dembovsky said: “I don’t think I need to tell you that you can only apply to have something dismissed if you know it exists, and the fact that they sent it out by ordinary mail caused a lot of things to go missing.”
He pointed out that the Johannesburg metro police department had also cancelled fines from as far back as 1 April 2009 because they had been sent out under the same conditions. Dembovsky pointed out that the Aarto Act made no provision for warrants of arrest.
“It is an administrative system and, therefore, anybody who threatens you with arrest at a roadblock is actually committing a crime of extortion,” he said.
He explained that from the date an infringement notice was signed for, motorists had 32 days in which to pay the fine at a 50 percent discount.
If left unpaid, a courtesy letter would be issued and the motorist would have to pay the full fine plus a R60 penalty fee.
If this was not paid within 32 days, an enforcement order would be issued and the motorist would be fined an additional R60.
Motorists who had received enforcement orders through registered mail and who had not paid the fines would not be able to renew their driving licences or their vehicle licences or buy or sell a vehicle.
“Daily, people are turned away from licensing departments, where the enforcement order has taken place,” Gerneke said, adding that more than 50 000 enforcement orders were issued each week.
The Star